Skip to main content
· 2/8/1967

People v. López Álamo

Citations

  • 94 P.R. 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • omitir cincuenta y tres páginas de las ciento siete páginas que debía tener el apéndice es un in-cumplimiento sustancial; las páginas omitidas eran, ade-más, “cruciales”, “necesarias” y “esenciales”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bages

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.