People v. Longo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing it is “essential to the crime of bribery” that the officer’s action “falls within the general scope of his duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Terry Christensen
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-07-08· cited 134×
• El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Bigio Pastrana
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1985-12-17· cited 131×
• People v. Massey
  California Court of Appeal· 1957-06-11· cited 37×
• People v. Guillory
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-03-16· cited 29×
• People v. Severino
  California Court of Appeal· 1953-12-21· cited 24×
• United States v. Terry Christensen
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-08-25· cited 23×
• Stebbins v. White
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-03-25· cited 17×
• State v. Emmanuel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1956-06-14· cited 6×
• People v. Litt
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-10-25
• Mamodoh Abouemara v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2023-06-06

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Roberts
  California Supreme Court· 1953-03-13· cited 148×
• People v. Williams
  California Supreme Court· 1945-11-16· cited 124×
• People v. Codina
  California Supreme Court· 1947-06-24· cited 83×
• People v. Brite
  California Supreme Court· 1937-10-06· cited 81×
• People v. Yant
  California Court of Appeal· 1938-06-03· cited 68×
• People v. Pierce
  California Supreme Court· 1939-11-24· cited 55×
• People v. Ward
  California Supreme Court· 1895-12-10· cited 27×
• People v. Beal
  California Court of Appeal· 1951-12-14· cited 20×
• People v. Silver
  California Court of Appeal· 1946-06-19· cited 6×