· 4/26/1995
People v. Longines
Citations
- 34 Cal. App. 4th 621
- 40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 356
- 95 Daily Journal DAR 5477
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3213
- 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 394
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ [A] conspiracy may be shown by circumstantial evidence and the agreement may be inferred from the conduct of the defendants mutually carrying out a common purpose in violation of a penal statute.” (quotation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Merrill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.