Skip to main content
· 4/26/1995

People v. Longines

Citations

  • 34 Cal. App. 4th 621
  • 40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 356
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 5477
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3213
  • 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ [A] conspiracy may be shown by circumstantial evidence and the agreement may be inferred from the conduct of the defendants mutually carrying out a common purpose in violation of a penal statute.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merrill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.