People v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a medical expert’s testimony that hospitalization was the least restrictive treatment alternative sufficiently demonstrated that there was no alternative treatment to hospitalization
• holding that a medical expert’s testimony that hospitalization was the least restrictive treatment alternative sufficiently demonstrated that there was no alternative treatment to hospitalization
• medical expert’s testimony that hospitalization was least restrictive alternative sufficiently demonstrated that there was no alternative treatment other than hospitalization
• medical expert's testimony that hospitalization was least restrictive alternative sufficiently demonstrated that there was no alternative treatment other than hospitalization
• medical expert's testimony that hospitalization was least restrictive alternative sufficiently demonstrated that there was no alternative treatment other than hospitalization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Winters
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-01-14· cited 23×
• In Re Bert W.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-25· cited 15×
• People v. Hannah E.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-28· cited 12×
• People v. Martens
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-02-16· cited 12×
• People v. Friberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-09· cited 9×
• In re: Hannah E.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-28