· 5/6/1985
People v. Lockhart
Citations
- 699 P.2d 1332
- 1985 Colo. LEXIS 432
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- party may not be held in contempt for refusing to do that which he is unable to do
- civil contempt where party who has a present ability to obey has refused to perform
- “A party may be held in contempt only for refusal to do exactly what the court order requires.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubofsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.