Skip to main content
· 5/6/1985

People v. Lockhart

Citations

  • 699 P.2d 1332
  • 1985 Colo. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • party may not be held in contempt for refusing to do that which he is unable to do
  • civil contempt where party who has a present ability to obey has refused to perform
  • “A party may be held in contempt only for refusal to do exactly what the court order requires.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dubofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.