People v. Loaiza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “officers had only seconds to react to the threat” of an oncoming vehicle
• holding that the plaintiff’s “version of the facts” which claimed he acted involuntarily rather than with the requisite intent during his interaction with a peace officer “implies the invalidity of his conviction for aggravated battery, [so] his civil claims are barred by Heck”
• describing whether there was a “natural breaking point” between the first and later uses of force as “a factual matter”
• describing whether there was a “natural breaking point” between the first and later uses of force as “a factual matter”
• finding claim Heck-barred where plaintiff alleged facts inconsistent with his conviction for aggravated battery of peace officer
• crediting § 1983 plaintiff’s version of facts where he was the party opposing summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).