Skip to main content

Citations

  • 138 A.D.2d 770
  • 525 N.Y.S.2d 390
  • 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the defendant to cross-examine the victim about prior accusations of rape when no basis for believing those accusations to be false existed
  • no abuse of discretion “where, as here, the party seeking to introduce such [other rape] evidence has no basis for believing that the prior complaints were false”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.