People v. Lindner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that such a statement does not sufficiently demonstrate the informant’s complicity in distribution of drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barker
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-22· cited 43×
• People of Illinois v. Gates
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 42×
• People v. Dowd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-24· cited 34×
• People v. Luna
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-04-25· cited 22×
• People v. Payne
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-22· cited 9×
• People v. Weinger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-08-01· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Oliveira
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-12-22· cited 6×
• People v. Stark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-04-21· cited 6×
• People v. Derry
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-06-26· cited 4×
• People v. Dunlap
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-04-26· cited 4×
• People v. Clark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-28· cited 4×
• People v. Vanco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-02· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Aguilar v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
• Spinelli v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
• Jones v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
• United States v. Harris
  Supreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
• United States v. Herman P. Unger, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1973-01-02· cited 58×
• People v. McNeil
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 18×
• People v. Cohn
  California Court of Appeal· 1973-02-22· cited 9×