Skip to main content
· 4/3/2008

People v. Lindmark

Citations

  • 887 N.E.2d 606
  • 381 Ill. App. 3d 638
  • 320 Ill. Dec. 462
  • 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the trial court has the discretion to limit the character and scope of closing argument”
  • finding no abuse of discretion in the limiting of cross-examination where the defendant attempted to introduce an issue during cross-examination without any evidence in support thereof
  • noting \the trial court has the discretion to limit the character and scope of closing argument\
  • finding no abuse of discretion in the limiting of cross-examination where the defendant attempted to introduce an issue during cross-examination without any evidence in support thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myerscough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.