· 4/3/2008
People v. Lindmark
Citations
- 887 N.E.2d 606
- 381 Ill. App. 3d 638
- 320 Ill. Dec. 462
- 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting “the trial court has the discretion to limit the character and scope of closing argument”
- finding no abuse of discretion in the limiting of cross-examination where the defendant attempted to introduce an issue during cross-examination without any evidence in support thereof
- noting \the trial court has the discretion to limit the character and scope of closing argument\
- finding no abuse of discretion in the limiting of cross-examination where the defendant attempted to introduce an issue during cross-examination without any evidence in support thereof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Myerscough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.