People v. Lindgren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• photographs of genital amputation and leg lacerations were improperly admitted where pathologist had given extensive oral testimony about the wounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lindgren
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 352×
• People v. Hale
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-18· cited 23×
• People v. Lindgren
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-23· cited 21×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-10· cited 10×
• United States Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. DeTella
  N.D. Illinois· 1996-03-01· cited 7×
• People v. Ross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-10-14· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. King
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
• People v. McDonald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 321×
• The People v. Myers
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 138×
• People v. Newbury
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 92×
• People v. Henenberg
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-09-25· cited 79×
• The PEOPLE v. Cage
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-05-23· cited 68×
• People v. Owens
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-11-15· cited 49×
• People v. Bolton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-19· cited 31×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-02-17· cited 29×
• People v. Gerecke
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-02-03· cited 20×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-21· cited 8×
• People v. Washington
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-04-28· cited 4×