People v. Lewins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere intent to commit a crime is not sufficient to constitute attempt
• holding judge’s truck, which was only used to transport judge “back and forth” from work, was not “used in” commerce
• finding in § 844(i) no indication that Congress intended to include \everybody and everything\
• finding in §844(i) no indication that Congress intended to include “everybody and everything”
• finding in §844(i) no indication that Congress intended to include “everybody and everything”
• \The element which is lacking is some overt act which points directly to the object offense.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).