People v. Leta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the rule barring admission of police reports did not disqualify an officer testifying from a report of a recorded recollection that otherwise satisfied Fed. R. Evid. 803(5)
• holding that the rule barring admission of police reports did not disqualify an officer testifying from a report of a recorded recollection that otherwise satisfied Fed. R. Evid. 803(5)
• “[L]ate tax payment [is] imma- terial on the issue of willfulness in a Section 7203 prosecu- tion.” (quoting United States v. Ming, 466 F.2d 1000, 1005 (7th Cir. 1972))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).