People v. Leshore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a due-process claim based on ending a “hearing without allowing [the party] to present more evidence and to testify” was not preserved
• recognizing that “[e]ven issues implicating constitutional rights must be” properly preserved before the appellate court may rule on the merits
• holding that a due-process claim based on ending a juvenile “hearing without allowing [the party] to present more evidence and to testify” was not preserved
• concluding issues, including constitutional issues, in CINA cases must be presented and ruled upon by the juvenile court to be preserved for appeal
• addressing issues raised on appeal by a county attorney in a case in which his authority to raise the issues was not challenged
• noting issues must be presented to and ruled on by the juvenile court in order to preserve error for appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).