People v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordinance which permitted arrest under “circumstances manifesting the purpose to1 engage in drug-related activity” held unconstitutional for vagueness
• ordinance which permitted arrest under “circumstances manifesting the purpose to engage in drug-related activity” held unconstitutional for vagueness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lee
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 178×
• People v. Carpenter
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 74×
• Mayor of Aldermen v. Welch
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2004-12-02· cited 34×
• Mayor & Board of Aldermen v. Scot Welch
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2003-07-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Krueger
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 177×
• People v. Boykin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-02-04· cited 148×
• City of Akron v. Rowland
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1993-09-22· cited 102×
• City of Chicago v. Morales
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-10-17· cited 94×
• People v. Hicks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-26· cited 86×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-27· cited 51×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-22· cited 39×
• State v. Muschkat
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-03-04· cited 25×