People v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is difficult to imagine more suggestive circumstances surrounding a photographic identification” than when more than one photograph of the defendant was included in the array

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. McTush
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-09-15· cited 92×
• People v. Lego
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-02-20· cited 69×
• State v. Mastracchio
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1992-07-13· cited 38×
• People v. Canity
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-15· cited 17×
• People v. Cohoon
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-11-30· cited 16×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-25· cited 7×
• People v. Scott
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-24· cited 6×
• People v. Owens
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-03-15· cited 6×
• People v. Lawless
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-08-14· cited 6×
• People v. Cohoon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-11-28· cited 5×
• People v. McTush
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-10-26· cited 5×
• People v. Perkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-04-18· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stovall v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
• Witherspoon v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
• The People v. Lee
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1969-12-19· cited 83×