People v. LaValla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no injury in fact shown when plaintiffs “claim[ed] only that, had the grants not been approved, the monies could conceivably have gone to some other, as yet totally imaginary project . which might have” benefited plaintiffs (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).