Skip to main content
· 7/30/1999

People v. Lapcheske

Citations

  • 86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 565
  • 73 Cal. App. 4th 571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the fact that legislature “clarified existing law by adding language that expressly prohibited the type of conduct defendant committed” did not mean that the conduct was not prohibited by the previous statute
  • that legislature “clarified existing law by adding language that expressly prohibited the type of conduct defendant committed” did not mean conduct was not prohibited by previous statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKINSTER

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.