People v. Langton
Citations
- 67 Cal. 427
- 7 P. 843
- 1885 Cal. LEXIS 660
Syllabus
<p>Cbehinaii Law—Mtjbdeb—Insteuction—Pbesuhftion as to Intention.—In a prosecution for murder, the court instructed the jury that “ every person is presumed to intend what his acts indicate his intention to have been; and if the defendanu fired a loaded pistol at the deceased and killed him, the law presumes that the defendant intended to kill the deceased; and unless the defendant can show that his intention was other than his act indicated, the law will not hold him guiltless.” Held, that the instruction was proper.</p> <p>Id.—Dbunkenness of Defendant.—As between murder in the second degree and manslaughter, the drunkenness of the offender can form no legitimate matter of inquiry.</p>
Judges: Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-03-11· cited 273×
- People v. WhitfieldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-02-28· cited 80×
- People v. BushtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-08-05· cited 72×
- People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-02· cited 28×
- State v. CooleyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-05-12· cited 21×
- State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court· 1903-08-03· cited 20×
- Platt v. SchreyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1885-09-10· cited 2×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named People v. Langton
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.