People v. Langley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting seven months expired between admonishments given at the defendant’s arraignment and his decision to waive counsel
• waiver held invalid because only admonishments had been given at the defendant's arraignment seven months earlier, at a time when the defendant was not requesting to waive counsel
• waiver held invalid because only admonishments had been given at the defendant’s arraignment seven months earlier, at a time when the defendant was not requesting to waive counsel
• similarly finding admonishments made months before defendant waived his right to counsel did not substantially comply with Rule 401(a)
• waiver held invalid because only admonishments had been given at the defendant's arraignment seven months earlier, at a time when the defendant was not requesting to waive counsel
• no admonishments outlined in Rule 401(a) were provided at the sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).