People v. Landrum (Charles)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although “an arm’s length relationship is not by itself a fiduciary relationship,” such a fiduciary relationship existed where there was an express agreement to hold information confidential through an employment contract
• discussing “fiduciary-like duty” of “trust 27 and confidence” that can give rise to insider trading liability (emphasis added)
• finding a relationship of “trust and confidence” where the plaintiff “would not have provided . . . information had [the defendant] not agreed to keep the information confidential”
• Where plaintiffs “appear[] to have endorsed the substance of the given charge,” they “ha[ve] waived any right to . . . review of the charge.”
• “[I]f a party invited the charge . . . [he] has waived 50 any right to appellate review of the charge.” (quoting United States v. Giovanelli, 464 F.3d 346, 51 351 (2d Cir. 2006)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).