Skip to main content

People v. Land

Citations

  • 30 Cal. App. 4th 220
  • 35 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 16421
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8885
  • 1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 1187

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[D]ominion and control are essentials of possession, and they cannot be inferred from mere presence or access.”
  • “Mere presence near the stolen property, or access to the location where the stolen property is found is not sufficient evidence of possession, standing alone.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Land

27 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.