Skip to main content
· 1/25/2008

People v. Lakisha M.

Citations

  • 882 N.E.2d 570
  • 227 Ill. 2d 259
  • 317 Ill. Dec. 690
  • 2008 Ill. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if reasonably possible, a reviewing court must construe a statute so as to - 21 - 2023 IL App (2d) 220340-U affirm its constitutionality
  • \no court has ever held that a juvenile is entitled to greater fourth amendment protections by reason of her minority\
  • “no court has ever held that a juvenile is entitled to greater fourth amendment protections by reason of her minority”
  • \the search and seizure provision of the Illinois Constitution\ provides the same rights to juveniles as the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution
  • “the search and seizure provision of the Illinois Constitution” provides the same rights to juveniles as the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution
  • Illinois's mandatory DNA collection and indexing laws did not violate adjudicated delinquent juvenile's right to privacy even though the Juvenile Court Act contained provisions intended to protect a juvenile's identity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.