Skip to main content
· 7/1/1867

People v. Lachanais

Citations

  • 32 Cal. 433

Syllabus

<p>Rational Doubt.—When the testimony on a trial for murder is entirely circumstantial, and there is nothing which connects the defendant directly with the homicide, the defendant if he desires it is entitled to a full and clear instruction as to what the law means by a rational doubt.</p> <p>Instructions in Criminal Case.—The better course is for tho Court never to refuse an instruction asked on behalf of a defendant in a criminal case, to which there is no valid objection although the jury may have been already fully instructed on the point. A District Attorney ought never to object to such instructions.</p>

Judges: Sanderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.