Skip to main content
· 6/28/2018

People v. Kuney (Michael)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering [1] whether the alleged victim had a subjective expectation of 3 privacy under the facts of the case, and [2] whether a reasonable person would have had an objective expectation of privacy under similar circumstances
  • considering [1] whether the alleged victim had a subjective expectation of 3 privacy under the facts of the case, and [2] whether a reasonable person would have had an objective expectation of privacy under similar circumstances
  • \The district court did not err by placing the guilty option above the not guilty option in the verdict form given to the jury.\
  • \The district court did not err by placing the guilty option above the not guilty option in the verdict form given to the jury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.