People v. Kolanek; People v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We must give the words of the MMMA their ordinary and plain meaning as would have been understood by the electorate.”
• “[I]f there are no material questions of fact and the defendant has not shown the elements listed in subsection (a
• “Sections 4 and 8 provide separate and distinct protections and require different showings . . .”
• “Questions of fact are the province of the jury, while questions of law are reserved to the courts.”
• “[I]f a defendant produces sufficient evidence of the elements of the defense, then the question whether the defendant has asserted a valid defense is for the jury to decide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).