People v. Klovstad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was entitled to disbelieve the defendant’s explanation for his absence
• holding that the trial court was entitled to disbe­lieve the defendant's explana­tion for his absence
• probationer, who had been advised of hearing date and admonished that hearing would take place in his absence if he failed to appear, claimed he was sick, but failed to notify court for nearly six months

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).