Skip to main content
· 11/21/2002

People v. Kitsmiller

Citations

  • 74 P.3d 376
  • 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 2022
  • 2002 WL 31608238

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no new findings are required “[w]hen the original sentence is not changed and the defendant is given full credit for the time served in community corrections . . . because evidence of the court’s rationale already exists on the record”
  • declining to review unpreserved due process claim that the defendant was entitled to an evidentiary hearing
  • describing process by which trial court can enhance sentence beyond the presumptive range under section 18-1.3-401(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ney, Kapelke, Nieto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.