Illinois Supreme Court· 1/21/2011

People v. Kitch

Citations

942 N.E.2d 1235
239 Ill. 2d 452
347 Ill. Dec. 655
2011 Ill. LEXIS 11

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the confrontation clause poses no restrictions on the admission of hearsay testimony if the declarant testifies at trial and is present to defend or explain that testimony” (internal quotation marks omitted)
stating the presumption in the context of a facial constitutional challenge
stating the presumption in the context of a facial constitutional challenge
“Under Crawford, the confrontation clause poses no restrictions on the admission of hearsay testimony if the declarant testifies at trial and is present ‘to defend or explain’ that testimony.” (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Kitch

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.