People v. Kitch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the confrontation clause poses no restrictions on the admission of hearsay testimony if the declarant testifies at trial and is present to defend or explain that testimony” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating the presumption in the context of a facial constitutional challenge
• stating the presumption in the context of a facial constitutional challenge
• “Under Crawford, the confrontation clause poses no restrictions on the admission of hearsay testimony if the declarant testifies at trial and is present ‘to defend or explain’ that testimony.” (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 59 n.9)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).