People v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If [the defendant’s statement] is found to have been voluntary and therefore admissible, the circuit [court] will enter a new judgment of conviction. If it is found not to have been voluntary, the circuit court will vacate the judgment of conviction and order a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-30· cited 41×
• People v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-06-23· cited 31×
• People v. Brooks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-02-20· cited 21×
• People v. Busija
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-10· cited 9×
• People v. Tucker-El
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-09· cited 7×
• People v. J. C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-22· cited 7×
• People v. Shoffner
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-04-13· cited 5×
• People v. Parquette
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-03-27· cited 4×
• In Re JC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-03-22· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
• The People v. Taylor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-11-19· cited 429×
• The People v. Lefler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 116×
• Swenson v. Stidham
  Supreme Court· 1973-01-22· cited 57×
• The PEOPLE v. McGuire
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 56×
• The PEOPLE v. Stark
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-01-25· cited 41×
• The People v. Jolliff
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-11-24· cited 22×
• The PEOPLE v. Jackson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-09-29· cited 20×
• People v. King
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-09-05· cited 4×