Skip to main content

People v. King

Citations

  • 581 P.2d 739
  • 41 Colo. App. 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a \compelling need\ test to a defendant's discovery request for the first time
  • “[t]o require direct evidence corroborating the child’s testimony in a case of this type would be to raise a hurdle to prosecution of such offenses which could not frequently be cleared”
  • the specific date of an offense is not a material allegation
  • charge specifying 6-month period held adequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.