Michigan Court of Appeals· 8/16/1994

People v. Kincade

Citations

522 N.W.2d 880
206 Mich. App. 477

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that “where an appellate court remands for some limited purpose following an appeal as of right in a criminal case, a second appeal as of right, limited to the scope of the remand, lies from the decision on remand”
explaining that, “where an appellate court remands for some limited purpose following an appeal as of right in a criminal case, a second appeal as of right, limited to the scope of the remand, lies from the decision on remand”
stating “Defendant’s postappeal motions for a new trial . . .were reviewable only as motions for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.501 et seq”
stating “Defendant’s postappeal motions for a new trial . . . were reviewable only as motions for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.501 et seq”
“Defendant’s postappeal motions for a new trial . . . were reviewable only as motions for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.501 et seq.”
“[W]here an appellate court remands for some limited purpose following an appeal as of right in a criminal case, a second appeal as of right, limited to the scope of remand, lies from the decision on remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin, Sawyer, Chamberlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Kincade

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.