Skip to main content
· 3/26/1998

People v. Kim

Citations

  • 694 N.E.2d 421
  • 91 N.Y.2d 407
  • 671 N.Y.S.2d 420
  • 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 596

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pre-sentence report’s detailed itemization of documented medical costs incurred by victim together with defendant’s express and implied concessions of the accuracy and authenticity of those figures afforded the court a sufficient evidentiary basis for restitution award
  • The goals of restitution “are to insure, to the maximum extent possible, that victims will be made whole and offenders will be rehabilitated and deterred, by requiring all defendants to confront concretely, and take responsibility for, the entire harm resulting from their acts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.