People v. Kepi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing, as an impermissible cross-appeal, the defendant’s argument that a jacket which was not suppressed by the circuit court should have been
• dismissing, as an impermissible cross-appeal, the defendant’s argument that a jacket which was not suppressed by the circuit court should have been
• apartment door wide open at 2 a.m. and blood stains on floor justified belief that someone might be in need of immediate aid

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).