People v. Kello

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s objection made on the basis of a trial evidence error is distinct from a Confrontation Clause objection and, thus, a hearsay objection is not sufficient to preserve constitutional claims
• holding that statement of identification was not present sense impression where declarant had 2lk hours “time for reflection” between observation of the crime in progress and subsequent identification to police as he was observing the perpetrator from his window
• holding that statement of identification was not present sense impression where declarant had 2½ hours \time for reflection\ between observation of the crime in progress and subsequent identification to police as he was observing the perpetrator from his window

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).