People v. Keller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]uch latitude is given in the admission of testimony to establish the identity of a person or a person’s name for identity can usually be established only through some form of hearsay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Wingren
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-03-04· cited 43×
• Obernauf v. Haberstich
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-22· cited 11×
• Hernandez v. Village of Cicero
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-30· cited 9×
• People v. Shaffer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-06-28· cited 5×
• People v. Rathnau
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-16· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Davis
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 208×
• Franciscan Sisters Health Care Corp. v. Dean
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-04-22· cited 153×
• The PEOPLE v. Palmer
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-03-22· cited 91×
• People v. Schuberth
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-06-02· cited 32×
• Village of Park Forest v. Angel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-04-01· cited 23×
• People v. Frye
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-04-05· cited 22×
• People v. Finley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-07-31· cited 20×
• People v. Ellerbusch
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-10-04· cited 19×
• People v. Horberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-05· cited 12×
• People v. Malloy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-04-16· cited 12×
• People v. Brennan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-03-27· cited 4×