People v. Kassover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that language in a statute or regulation may require reference to ‘definitions’ in that or in a related statute, does not necessarily render such statute or regulation vague or indefinite.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-06-23· cited 4×
• People v. Le Bous
  Binghamton City Court· 1961-05-02· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Firth
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1913-06-27· cited 12×
• People v. Hammerstein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-04-12· cited 10×
• People v. Levenstein
  New York Court of Appeals· 1956-01-12· cited 8×
• People v. Halbreich
  New York City Court of Special Sessions· 1959-06-03· cited 5×
• People v. Kassover
  New York City Magistrates' Court· 1959-08-25· cited 1×

Other cases named People v. Kassover

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Kassover
  New York City Magistrates' Court· 1959-08-25· cited 1×