People v. Kappas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant's awareness of his intoxication “simply does not matter since the liability is absolute____ The violation is in the doing, not the knowing.”
• “Based on the totality of the circumstances, a jury could reasonably conclude that defendant’s [blood alcohol content] at the time he was driving was .10%”
• evidence that the defendant was weaving out of his lane was relevant to show that he was driving under the influence
• results of test administered thirty-eight minutes after driving properly admitted without further evidence because delay reasonable and passage of time affects weight of test results
• evidence that the defendant was weaving out of his lane was relevant to show that he was driving under the influence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).