People v. Kammeraad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[DJefendant.. . needlessly demanded an interpreter, as it is quite evident that defendant is fluent in the King’s English . . . .”
• “With respect to defendant’s right of allocution, MCR 6.425(E)(1)(c)[4] provides that at sentencing, the court is required on the record to give defendants an opportunity to advise the court of any circumstances they believe the court should consider in imposing sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).