Michigan Supreme Court· 7/3/2001

People v. Kaczmarek

Citations

628 N.W.2d 484
464 Mich. 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that the amendment applies to “criminal prosecutions for crimes committed on or after” the effective date of the amendment
stating that criminal -4- defendants “are likely to be on parole by the time their cases reach this Court” and addressing the appeal on its merits
cautioning that the defendant’s appeal following a probation revocation proceeding was limited to “only those issues that he could not have raised in an appeal from his” original conviction
explaining that the scope of a defendant’s appeal from a resentencing following the revocation of probation is limited to those issues the defendant could not have raised in an appeal from his initial conviction
explaining that the scope of a defendant’s appeal from a resentencing following the revocation of probation is limited to those issues the defendant could not have raised in an appeal from his initial conviction
explaining that the scope of a defendant’s appeal from a resentencing following the revocation of probation is limited to those issues that a defendant could not have raised in an appeal from his or her initial conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marilyn J. Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.