Skip to main content

Citations

  • 303 A.D.2d 421
  • 755 N.Y.S.2d 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a lower federal court’s conclusion that state law violated the federal constitution
  • “The defendant’s contention that Penal Law § 125.25(2) is unconstitutionally vague is without merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.