Skip to main content
· 4/26/2018

People v. Joubert

Citations

  • 102 N.E.3d 1065
  • 78 N.Y.S.3d 284
  • 31 N.Y.3d 1014

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • conclusion of trial court as to contract interpretation is to be “considered afresh by [the appellate court] as a matter of law”
  • “Where ambiguities exist in the language of a consent decree, the court may turn to other ‘aids of construction,’ such as other documents to which the consent decree refers, as well as legal materials setting the context for the use of particular terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.