· 4/26/2018
People v. Joubert
Citations
- 102 N.E.3d 1065
- 78 N.Y.S.3d 284
- 31 N.Y.3d 1014
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- conclusion of trial court as to contract interpretation is to be “considered afresh by [the appellate court] as a matter of law”
- “Where ambiguities exist in the language of a consent decree, the court may turn to other ‘aids of construction,’ such as other documents to which the consent decree refers, as well as legal materials setting the context for the use of particular terms.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feinman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.