People v. Josiah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hold-ing that where “substantial confusion” calls into question whether there was a “meeting of the minds” over a plea agreement, there is no agreement to be enforced
• invalidating plea agreement where layperson may not have understood its terms
• plea was invalid where the record revealed substantial confusion as to whether habeas petitioner “had understood the agreement, and thus [left] doubt as to whether any ‘meeting of the minds’ ever resulted from plea negotiations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).