People v. Jones
Citations
- 32 Cal. 80
Syllabus
<p>Evidence on Trial for Robberr.—On the trial for an assault with intent to rob, evidence on behalf of the prosecution is not admissible for the purpose of showing that the defendant entered into an agreement to commit another robbery on a different occasion.</p> <p>Confessions of Defendant.—If the prosecution provo the defendant's confessions of the crime with which he stands charged, circumstances may be shown corroborative of those confessions.</p> <p>Evidence in Criminal Case.—On the trial of a defendant charged with one crime, testimony is not admissible to show that he had been engaged in plans for the commission of other crimes.</p>
Judges: Sawyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-09-15· cited 64×
- People v. ChannellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-10-11· cited 24×
- Woodward v. Fruitvale Sanitary DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-09-26· cited 20×
- People ex rel. Finigan v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-09-05· cited 15×
- State v. BergerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1903-10-29· cited 13×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.