People v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, once a motion to suppress is decided at a pretrial hearing, “the focus of the trial testimony is not directed to a reestablishment of the issues previously resolved at the pretrial hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Brown
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 57×
• People v. Velasco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-08· cited 30×
• People v. Bury
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-29· cited 8×
• People v. Weathersby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-22· cited 3×
• Facundo Ramos-Osario v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2026-06-24

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Caballero
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 434×
• People v. Martin
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 150×
• People v. Hopkins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-05-22· cited 122×
• The People v. Hill
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-01-19· cited 111×
• People v. Simmons
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-03-24· cited 110×
• People v. Brooks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-30· cited 106×
• People v. Winters
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-06-17· cited 52×
• People v. Armstrong
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-11-20· cited 44×
• People v. Aldridge
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-01-23· cited 38×
• People v. Hebein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-12-30· cited 23×
• People v. Lane
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-06-02· cited 16×
• People v. Merrero
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-02-01· cited 12×
• People v. Beamer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-05-08· cited 10×
• People v. Coleman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-21· cited 6×