Skip to main content

People v. Jones

Citations

  • 967 P.2d 166
  • 1997 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3420
  • 1997 Colo. App. LEXIS 289
  • 1997 WL 790524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing a defendant to be prosecuted as a habitual offender for offenses that were subject to mandatory joinder would be “inconsistent with the General Assembly’s intent to reserve habitual criminal sentencing for serious recidivists”
  • allowing a defendant to be prosecuted as a habitual offender for offenses that were subject to mandatory joinder would be “inconsistent with the General Assembly’s intent to reserve habitual criminal sentencing for serious recidivists”
  • the defendant “was not entitled to have any other 3 issues determined by the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothenberg, Criswell, Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.