People v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor should request forfeiture promptly, because delay “may well leave with defendants and sureties the impression that bonds are of minor importance and [may] be ignored with slight danger of any appreciable adverse effect on them.”
• prosecutor should request forfeiture promptly, because delay \may well leave with defendants and sureties the impression that bonds are of minor importance and [may] be ignored with slight danger of any appreciable adverse effect on them.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Caro
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-03-14· cited 15×
• State v. Zylstra
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1978-03-22· cited 14×
• People v. Calloway
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-04-13· cited 12×
• Herbertson v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1966-05-31· cited 9×
• People v. Jaramillo
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1967-05-29· cited 7×
• Moreno v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-06-26· cited 6×
• People v. Young
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1971-06-22· cited 3×
• E. & E. Bonding Co. v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1966-06-27· cited 3×
• People v. Gossett
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-02-09· cited 1×
• People v. Salas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-05-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Fiannaca
  New York Court of Appeals· 1954-04-15· cited 25×
• People v. Fiannaca
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1953-11-11· cited 2×