Skip to main content

People v. Johnson

Citations

  • 945 N.E.2d 610
  • 408 Ill. App. 3d 157
  • 348 Ill. Dec. 841
  • 2010 Ill. App. LEXIS 1256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the circuit court erred by combining the first three principles of Rule 431(b) into one broad principle and omitting the fourth principle
  • concluding the circuit court erred by combining the first three principles of Rule 431(b) into one broad principle and omitting the fourth principle
  • rejecting the “defendant’s invitation to conclude the evidence was closely balanced based upon rote speculation about the course of deliberations or the note from the jury”
  • rejecting a similar argument as being based on “logic *** of rather dubious merit”
  • court failed to ask if the prospective jurors understood and accepted any of the principles and omitted the fourth principle altogether

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toomin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.