People v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• drawing a distinction between an order directing a defendant to do or refrain from doing a particular act-that could be punished by contempt-and a conditional order that states either the ramifications of its violation or has such consequences established by law
• drawing a distinction between an order directing a defendant to do or refrain from doing a particular act—that could be punished by contempt—and a conditional order that states either the ramifications of its violation or has such consequences established by law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Urke
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-07-19· cited 148×
• People v. SELGA
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-04-22· cited 50×
• State v. Michael Letasky
  Montana Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 40×
• People v. Brenn
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-18· cited 34×
• People v. Petty
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-01-28· cited 34×
• Selma Auto Mall II v. Appellate Department
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-04-30· cited 21×
• People v. Kubby
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-04-11· cited 15×
• People v. Ricardo A.
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-03-01· cited 13×
• State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 4×