Skip to main content

People v. Johnson

Citations

  • 494 N.W.2d 873
  • 197 Mich. App. 362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s assertion that the police officers destroyed evidence regarding his arrest was not supported by anything other than the defendant’s own testimony and that defendant failed to show the police officers acted in bad faith
  • explaining that “the routine destruction of taped police broadcasts, where the purpose is not to destroy evidence for a forthcoming trial, does not mandate reversal”
  • stating that, in the absence of evidence of bad faith, the loss of evidence before a defense request for production does not violate due process
  • “[T]he routine destruction of taped police broadcasts, where the purpose is not to destroy evidence for a forthcoming trial, does not mandate reversal.
  • “Similarly, the routine destruction of taped police broadcasts, where the purpose is not to destroy evidence for a forthcoming trial, does not mandate reversal.”
  • “[T]he routine destruction of taped police broadcasts, where the purpose is not to destroy evidence for a forthcoming trial, does not mandate reversal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepherd, P.J., and Weaver and Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.