Skip to main content

People v. John W.

Citations

  • 185 Cal. App. 3d 801
  • 229 Cal. Rptr. 783
  • 1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2040

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although there was considerable and conflicting testimony about reliability in the scientific community of the penile plethysmograph, the test results were properly excluded
  • court held that criminal defendant had failed to establish that the plethysmograph “was a reliable means of diagnosing sexual deviance” and ruled the test inadmissible
  • court held that criminal defendant had failed to establish that the plethysmograph \was a reliable means of diagnosing sexual deviance\ and ruled the test inadmissible
  • procedure did not meet evidentiary standards of reliability of the method and general acceptance in the scientific community

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. John W.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.